Vox Hunt: On My Nightstand

Comments

It looks very tidy compared to mine.

"Anna Karenina, greatest book ever written"

A very good book, to be sure -- but you live in a world that was once inhabited by the likes of James Joyce and Marcel Proust.

I suppose we'll just agree to disagree then. :) Joyce is excellent, but nobody compares to Tolstoy. He is in his own league completely. Check out TIME magazine's "Top 10 Greatest Books" here...

http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1578073,00.html

Of course, trying to rank literature is silly and subjective, but my personal opinion is quite in accord with TIME's.

Ha -- I forgot Flaubert. Thank you.

I think the maker of this list is a little too keen on Russian literature; yet, oddly, decided to leave Crime and Punishment off the list. I think the whole idea of a 10 greatest books list is pretty moronic.

I think Joyce is the writer everyone since wishes they were.

What you don't realize is that, in the original Russian, Tolstoy reads like Danielle Steele. ;-)

This wasn't one person silly. According to TIME, this Top 10 list is derived from "the top 10 lists of 125 of the world's most celebrated writer's combined."

Like Danielle Steele? Are you Russian? I am, and I speak fluent Russian, and have read the book in its native language. That actually personally offends me, as the novel in its original Russian is the most life-changing, brilliant piece of literature I could imagine.
Furthermore... how can you say that making a top 10 list is moronic, and then make a blanket statement like "Joyce is the writer everyone wishes they were" ...? You are epitomizing what you dislike.

Wow.

Okay, first of all, I was just teasing. I liked "Anna Karenina," I don't read or speak Russian, and I certainly didn't intend to offend or upset you.

Secondly, . . . maybe I don't have a secondly. Maybe that's it.

Sorry.

It's okay, not a big deal, I am all for an intelligent discussion, but making digs like that Danielle Steele thing (especially to a native Russian) about my favorite book just isn't polite. It's not about the book though, I completely respect that you prefer Joyce.. but I wouldn't insult Joyce to prove my point.

I guess I would say that it's dumb to try to rank things that are experienced subjectively. Breakfast of Champions profoundly moved me when I read it, but it was due to the circumstances of my life as much as the power of Vonnegut's prose -- I wouldn't put it at the top of any "greatest novels" list, but at the same time, I can't really say that any novel has effected me more deeply.

However, subjective experiences cannot be compared. You are moved by Anna Karenina, as am I; I am moved by Dubliners and Ulysses, as (perhaps) you are -- how can we compare these experiences? Is it even worthwhile to argue about how one can enjoy one or the other to a greater or lesser degree?

But if you take the subjectivity -- the emotional resonance, the feeling of connection -- out of the equation, and try to rank works based on their technical virtuosity or whatever other scale you might use, what's the point? Works of art are supposed to move us.

I don't know what I'm trying to say.

Internet correspondence is not the best medium for teasing (I really have nothing against Tolstoy). Again, I didn't mean to offend or upset you, and I apologize.

Note that no one's rushing to the defense of Danielle Steele . . . ;-)

Your point is well taken, and I agree! Everyone has their own idea of what, to them, is the greatest novel written. It is pointless to argue something so subjective. These books are all spectacular.
Aww we all agree to disagree. I love happy endings.
thats a good mixer lol.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in